IPC’s Public Policy Impact in 2024

By Rich Cappetto, Senior Director, IPC North American Government Relations  

 

Key Summary

• 2024 saw major U.S. policy actions that strengthened domestic electronics manufacturing, building on momentum from 2023.
• IPC’s influence grew across Congress, the White House, and key federal agencies as policymakers shifted from a “chips only” mindset to a full “silicon-to-systems” approach.
• IPC secured wins on advanced packaging, defense industrial base policy, and $45M in Senate-backed funding for domestic PCB manufacturing.
• Workforce efforts advanced through White House engagement, opposition to burdensome DOL apprenticeship rules, and expanded CHIPS-related advocacy.
• IPC’s first-ever grants program pursued nearly $70M in federal opportunities to support workforce, supply chains, and manufacturing capacity.


The most popular and enduring metaphor for the public policy process is sausage-making because it is a messy process with sometimes mysterious and unappealing ingredients. Throughout the year, the IPC Government Relations team keeps an eye on the sausage-making so you don’t have to, although we do need your help in the kitchen. Fortunately, over the last year, we’ve seen evidence that our collaborative efforts are working, setting the table for more progress going forward.  

 

A series of major actions in the United States in 2024 signaled a trend toward greater support of the domestic electronics industry – building on the remarkably successful year we had in 2023

 

As the Chips and Science Act of 2022 was implemented, IPC urged the U.S. Government to move from a “chips only” approach to a “silicon-to-systems” strategy. As a testament to our growing reputation and influence, IPC’s expertise was increasingly sought out by policymakers as they strategized how to secure supply chains for national defense and critical infrastructure. IPC brought the industry’s voice to the highest levels of the U.S. government on Capitol Hill, at the White House, and across the executive branch at agencies including the departments of Commerce, Labor, and Defense. 

 

Here are a few of our most notable successes of 2024. 

 

  • Advanced Packaging: The National Advanced Packaging Manufacturing Program (NAPMP) cited IPC’s 2021 report on advanced packaging in the agency’s published strategy to build a domestic advanced packaging ecosystem.

  • Defense Industrial Base: The Senate Armed Services Committee included IPC-recommended language in its report on the National Defense Authorization Act, directing the Department of Defense to brief Congress as to how it proposes to close industrial base gaps in electronics manufacturing.

  • Defense PCBs: The Senate Appropriations Committee included IPC’s recommended language in its report on the FY25 defense spending bill, allocating $45 million in the Defense Production Act account specifically for printed circuit board manufacturing. The report also encouraged ongoing prioritization of PCB manufacturing and future-year funding.

  • Grasstops Advocacy: Six IPC members met with more than 14 congressional offices during Impact Day 2024, including influential Members of the appropriations, commerce, armed services, and tax committees and congressional leadership to advocate for the domestic electronics industry.

  • Workforce and CHIPS: IPC CEO John W. Mitchell was invited to represent the electronics industry at a White House roundtable discussion on workforce development and the CHIPS Act with the Director of the National Science Foundation and others.

  • Apprenticeship: IPC submitted formal comments to the U.S. Department of Labor, opposing a 700-page regulation that would have added enormous administrative burdens on employers seeking to make use of apprenticeships to build their workforce. The proposed regulation was later withdrawn.

  • AI Data Centers: IPC participated in a research project with the U.S. Department of Commerce to identify risks in the supply chain for AI Data Centers. IPC’s report was referenced in the department’s subsequent findings, which recommended federal support to stimulate the domestic PCB and PCB assembly sectors.  

  • Government Grants: IPC built the association’s first-ever integrated grants program and applied for nearly $70 million in government funding opportunities to drive workforce growth, secure critical supply chains, and advance domestic manufacturing capabilities. IPC’s grants effort builds on its advocacy by ensuring the organization is positioned to capture the strategic investments that will flow from our policy wins. 

 

What were the year’s most meaningful U.S. government policy wins to you? 

 

Rest assured we will continue building on these efforts and relationships in 2025 and beyond, as we do expect a continued focus on building domestic manufacturing and shoring up critical supply chains. 

 

 

Q:
Why was 2024 significant for IPC’s public policy influence?
A:

Because policymakers increasingly recognized the need for full electronics supply chain strengthening, seeking IPC’s expertise on national security, manufacturing, and workforce issues.
 

Q:
What major defense-related accomplishments did IPC secure?
A:

Senate report language directing DoD to close electronics industrial base gaps and Senate support for $45M in Defense Production Act funding dedicated to PCB manufacturing.
 

Q:
How did IPC impact workforce and CHIPS discussions?
A:

IPC CEO John Mitchell participated in a White House roundtable, and IPC successfully opposed a burdensome DOL apprenticeship regulation that was later withdrawn.
 

Q:
What role did IPC play in advanced packaging policy?
A:

IPC’s 2021 advanced packaging report was cited in the National Advanced Packaging Manufacturing Program strategy, reinforcing IPC’s leadership in this domain.
 

Q:
What new organizational capability did IPC launch?
A:

IPC created an integrated grants program and applied for nearly $70M in federal funding aligned with policy wins and industry needs.