U.S. Tags Vietnam on Unfair Currency Practices But Delays Penalties

Key Summary

• USTR found Vietnam’s currency practices “unreasonable” and burdensome to U.S. commerce under Section 301
• Despite the findings, USTR chose not to impose tariffs or other penalties at this time
• The decision leaves room for the incoming Biden administration to shape its own response
• Future actions, including tariffs, remain possible depending on policy direction and industry input
• Electronics imports from Vietnam have surged as companies shifted production during U.S.–China trade tensions


Today, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) released a report on their Section 301 investigation into "Vietnam's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Currency Valuation." The Federal Register notice is here. The report draws three conclusions:

  • Vietnam's acts, policies, and practices in regards to currency valuation are "unreasonable;"
  • Vietnam's acts, policies, and practices "burden or restrict U.S. commerce"; and
  • These acts, policies, and practices are actionable under Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act.

Notably, however, USTR chose not to take any steps towards imposing tariffs or other measures to remedy these issues. There had been some suggestion that USTR was considering levying tariffs against all imported products from Vietnam.

That means the incoming Biden Administration will be able to craft their own response, rather than being forced to deal with hastily implemented tariffs at the end of an outgoing administration. There are numerous ways that the new USTR may choose to deal with the currency valuation issues, and tariffs may still be levied at a later date. However, the delay gives industry an opportunity to engage with the incoming USTR staff, including USTR-designate Katherine Tai. 

U.S. imports of electronics from Vietnam nearly doubled from 2018 to 2019, as the U.S. and China ramped up their tariff war.

 

Q:
Why did the U.S. investigate Vietnam’s currency practices?
A:

USTR examined whether Vietnam’s currency valuation policies created unfair trade advantages. The investigation concluded that the practices were unreasonable and restricted U.S. commerce, making them actionable under Section 30
 

Q:
Why were no tariffs imposed on Vietnam despite the findings?
A:

USTR chose not to take immediate action, avoiding rushed penalties during the transition between administrations. This allows the Biden administration to evaluate the issue and set its own strategy without inheriting last-minute tariff decisions.
 

Q:
Could tariffs on Vietnamese goods still occur in the future?
A:

Yes. Although no measures were imposed now, the findings make tariffs or other trade actions possible. The new administration may consider a range of options depending on economic conditions, diplomatic priorities, and industry feedback.
 

Q:
Why are electronics companies paying attention to this decision?
A:

Electronics imports from Vietnam nearly doubled from 2018 to 2019 as firms shifted production away from China during tariff disputes. Any new tariffs on Vietnam could significantly affect supply chains and sourcing strategies across the sector.
 

Q:
How can industry engage with USTR on this issue?
A:

The delay creates an opportunity for companies to share data and concerns with the incoming USTR team, led by Katherine Tai. Engagement can help inform future decisions and ensure policymakers understand supply chain impacts.