Signal Integrity, Reliability, and Cost Evaluation of PCB Interlayer Crosstalk Reduction
The push for faster data rates and increased signal density in printed circuit boards (PCBs) increases the risk of signal crosstalk on high-speed communication busses which can be highly detrimental to system performance. Interlayer crosstalk between vertical layers is a significant contributor to eye degradation and overall signal quality. This phenomenon can occur when signal traces are routed above/below plated through hole (PTH, also referenced herein as “vias” or “pins”) antipad on the adjacent reference planes, exposing traces on neighboring signal layers to each other. This interlayer crosstalk can be minimized by reducing manufacturing driven layer-to-layer misregistration and reducing the antipad diameter around back drilled PTHs. However, implementing these improvements in the PCB manufacturing process adds cost and raises potential reliability concerns. For example, reducing the PTH antipad diameter on the planes through which backdrilling will occur increases the probability of copper plane exposure after backdrilling. This could pose a shorting risk due conductive anodic filament growth, electrochemical migration, or copper burrs.
This paper provides a cost-benefit analysis of PCB process improvements to reduce interlayer crosstalk, including a reduction in the allowable misregistration between adjacent cores and reduced antipad diameter around back drilled holes. As a part of this analysis, the signal integrity (SI) improvements gained by reducing core-to-core misregistration from 127 µm (5 mil) down to 76.2 – 101.6 µm (3 - 4 mil) were modeled as well as the SI improvements gained from reducing back drilled hole antipad diameter from 0.76 mm (30 mil) to 0.71 mm (28 mil) or even less for a 0.3 mm (11.8 mil) primary drill. The relative cost adder of these improvements was estimated based on PCB manufacturer input. Further, the reliability of backdrill exposed ground and/or power planes with and without hole fill was evaluated through temperature/humidity/bias testing and micro-sectioning of PCB coupons. It was found that reducing the antipad diameter around back drilled PTHs had more impact on crosstalk reduction than reducing the core-to-core misregistration. Taking signal/power integrity benefits, reliability, and cost into consideration, recommendations for pursing reduced core-to-core misregistration and smaller antipads around backdrilled holes are provided.