All things corrode,and the rate of corrosion among electronics devices is accelerating. Electronic devices are being used in more places than ever before. They are finding more uses,they're more portable,and they're increasingly used in polluted areas. Worldwide industrialization has produced more sulfur,chlorine and nitrogen compounds that aggressively attack electronics. The initiatives to eliminate lead (Pb) in electronics reduced the ability for circuitry to resist corrosion. To replace thick tin-lead deposits more circuits employ thin,easily corroded surface finishes on the PCB,connectors,and component leads. There is a need for better prediction of service-life corrosion,yet there is a lack of adequate test methods. Environmental testing rarely progresses beyond thermal cycling or heat/humidity. Mixed flowing gas testing uses standardized pollutants as a stress to electronics,but has limited success in reproducing all corrosion failures. An elevated rate in the observation of one type of failure,termed creeping corrosion,motivated the electronics industry to review corrosion test methods. As part of the IPC 3-11g committee,a number of OEM's,EMS providers,PCB fabricators,material suppliers,universities,and testing laboratories joined forces to address the need for better corrosion prediction.
The project conducted experiments using environmental pollutants and various levels of exposure to moisture to form corrosion salts from copper circuitry. A main objective of the testing was to create a standardized method for inducing corrosion. Test results will show the ability to recreate creep corrosion at the participating laboratories. As a project summary,this paper will review the many attributes of a PCB surface finish,the ways that each finish can fail under environmental contamination,the mechanism of creeping corrosion,and new ways to interrupt the corrosion mechanism while preserving other surface finish attributes. The summary contained herein had been intended to include the latest corrosion results from the IPC 3-11g team; however,the testing was not complete by the time of publication. This review will detail the status of the team’s findings to date,provide references to newly collated data,and chart the team’s forward direction.