Effect of Design Variables on the Reliability of Lead Free Area Array Connectors
As the use of area array connectors has become more widespread in electronic assemblies,the need to evaluate their reliability has increased. There is,however,limited information on how best to perform accelerated thermal cycle testing of area array connectors. Though specifications such as IPC-9701A can serve as useful guidelines in assessing second level reliability of these components,area array connector test vehicles are more complicated than test vehicles designed for testing traditional area array packages,as they require the use of daughter cards to allow the daisy chain to be completed and to properly emulate a real-world implementation of the connectors. While IPC-9701A can provide useful guidance in designing the motherboard,it offers no insight on the design of the daughter card,nor does it provide assistance in determining which version of a connector to test in cases where there are several variations within a connector product family. As accelerated thermal cycling tests can be expensive and time consuming,there is a need to assess the impact of these variables on the reliability of a connector to provide guidance in choosing the best way to test,and to assist in understanding how changes in the design between the test vehicle and the final product design may be expected to change the reliability. The “Metro2” test vehicle was used to help generate data on these issues. In addition to providing manufacturability and reliability data on a selection of lead free area array connectors,three variations on one of the mezzanine connectors were studied to help assess the impact of design variables. The first comparison focused on the impact of changing the daughter card thickness from 0.062” to 0.093”. Previous work on a tin/lead version of this connector indicated that the flexure of the 0.062” thick daughter card during thermal cycling played a role in the location of the solder joint failures observed,and as a result,it is expected that the increase in thickness may change the location of the failures and could also affect the reliability of the connector. The second comparison focused on the stack height of the connector. A 4mm stack height version of the connector was compared with a 6mm stack height version. The results of accelerated thermal cycling will be presented for the variations of this mezzanine connector along with the failure analysis results. Results will also be compared to those obtained on the tin/lead version of the same connector.