Peel Strength of Deposited Adhesiveless FCCL,or,Why Don’t They Ever Say,“It Sticks Too Good?”
The peel test will be reviewed,with special attention given to deposited adhesiveless copperclads. Details of the specification are reviewed The relevance of the title subject will be addressed from the perspective that a vendor and a customer of a flexible material can head off disaster if they spend time communicating on what the requirements of that substrate material are.
We will consider the mechanics of the test,IPC specifications,will be reviewed with specific case histories in which the choice of peel method was critical to problem resolution.
We will discuss the many influences on peel strength values by presenting data on variables such as conductor thickness,conductor width,and copper treatment,as well as more subtle things such as surface finish and even simple choice of test method. Details such as the effect of surface finish will receive comment. Data concerning ENIG-plating will serve as the backdrop for this segment.
Audience members will be encouraged to participate by asking the “expert” to answer questions such as,“which test is most important,” and “how much peel strength is enough?” This will be used as a teaching opportunity to exemplify the value of close communication between customer and supplier.
Failure modes will be described for deposited clad flexible substrates. The value of investigation of this characteristic will be stressed,together with other investigational techniques for the engineer who may be new to the industry. Among these nuggets will be the exhortation to learn to write good English,which will permit a partial answer to the question posed in the title.
Choice of substrate material with respect to the tiecoat will be clarified by discussion of processing and product characteristics.
A brief mention will be made of alternative methods of adhesion measurement,including shear testing and tensile testing. Again,with the author?s own data on adhesiveless FCCLs,a picture will be provided of the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method.