As technology progresses,electronic components that do bigger and better things are hitting the market. At the same time,the size of the PCB is shrinking. While circuit board designers could resolve the issue by building multiple boards into products to accommodate the additional components,they instead are opting to squeeze them onto a single PCB.
To fit more components in a smaller area,designers decrease the size and spacing of test targets commonly used in bed-of nails fixtures. These test targets allow electrical access to the UUT. The challenge is to hit these smaller targets and still achieve accurate test results. To accomplish this,it is only logical that test probes also need to be smaller. While other types of ATE,including flying probes,X-ray,built-in self-test (BIST),boundary scan software,and optical inspection,combine to enhance the testing of high-density PCBs,the bed-of nails fixture continues to offer the best combination of speed and test coverage in a high-volume manufacturing environment. Since the beginning of automated PCB testing,designers have pushed fixture and probe manufacturing companies to build a better bed-of-nails fixture. However,any new product innovations must be balanced with design for test (DFT) guidelines that have evolved over time to keep pace with the latest advances in PCB and fixture manufacturing. The challenge is getting everyone in the design,manufacturing,and test departments to coordinate their efforts and agree upon the guidelines.
A solution was needed to solve probing issues that were starting to make waves in the in-circuit,bed-of-nails test world. The problem was the reluctance of test managers and technicians to use the “fragile” .050 (1.27) center probes and the insistence of test board designers to put test points on .050 (1.27) and closer centers. The probes designed for .050 (1.27) centers were smaller,harder to work with,had lower spring forces and damaged more easily compared to the widely accepted .100 (2.54) and .075 (1.91) center probes. The new test probe concept was conceived and initially released in February 1998 as a solution.
While the concept of socketless probing isn’t new,the technology wasn’t widely used throughout the industry until the growing demand for smaller test targets started calling for the use of smaller,more delicate test probes. Now,socketless
technology is widely recognized for its capability to use larger,longer lasting probes on high-density PCBs. This is made possible by joining two parts: a probe and a termination pin. In the example shown in Figure 1,the modified interconnect receptacle at the bottom of the probe tube fits securely onto the interconnect pin at the top of the termination. This effectively removes the conventional socket from the system reducing the overall diameter of the probe and thus allowing that same probe to be mounted on closer centers.