Oven Characterization Using Machine Quality Management (MQM) Tools
Stability and repeatability are imperative in any
reflow oven today. If oven operation is not validated
periodically,all subsequent profiles and adjustments
are not reliable in finding or maintaining an optimum
reflow process window for products. This is
especially true for lead free where the actual process
window has shrunk to a fraction of what everyone is
used to when using eutectic solders.
Ovens have been validated using mock-up FR4
assemblies,where the assembly is wired with
thermocouples and used with a profiling unit.
Unfortunately,the thermocouples lift,the board
suffers warping and material degradation after only a
short number of passes through the oven. Stainless
steel and aluminum plates have been configured to
resemble a board,and are able to withstand repeated
thermal cycles. However the material is so alien
compared to FR4,the radically different thermal
conductivity of the material masks potential
weaknesses in oven design. If you want a true
characterization of all oven parameters,it’s important
to match these physical properties within a single test
tool. Therefore,to do proper thermal validation,it is
best to use a tool specifically designed for that job
rather than to try to create either type of vehicle
described above. The composites used to create the
pallet for thermal characterization and validation
equipment known generically as Machine Quality
Management tools (MQM) have highly insulating
properties similar to typical FR4 material as well as a
high tolerance for long endurance use in high
temperature environments.
For this experiment,we took a typical MQM tool and
investigated the performance of four different ovens.
The tool measured the uniformity of gas temperature
and the heat transfer characteristics and saved the
data from each oven which was downloaded into the
accompanying MQM software program for
comparison and analysis. Our goal was to find out
how easy or difficult it is to characterize specific
physical properties of a given oven design as they
relate to the soldering process and to see if the results
indicate a dramatic differences in oven performance,
specifically,the uniformity across the width and
length of the tunnel as well as the heat transfer
capacity.
Using an MQM tool,it was possible to characterize
specific physical properties of each oven to see if oven design significantly impacted the steady state
operation of the individual zones as well as the entire
heated length. We assumed the uniformity or lack
thereof in the measured air temperature along the
length of the tunnel and across the width of the tunnel
would have an impact on the ability to consistently
and uniformly heat the product to be run. The
difference in temperature as measured between the
air and the high mass sensors of the MQM tool
demonstrated the efficiency of each oven to transfer
heat,or heat transfer value. A higher heat transfer
value means tighter control over the reflow process.
This proportionality is related to the heat transfer
coefficient,however,is not the exact heat transfer
coefficient for any particular oven. Several tools exist
to characterize the heat transfer coefficient as well as
defining the portion of heating associated with
infrared energy.