A Critical Evaluation of ROSE Testing as Compared to SIR for Monitoring PCB Cleanliness
Resistance of Solvent Extract (ROSE) testing has been grandfathered not only into the modern IPC standards without validation on modern materials, but it has also become grandfathered into the industry's concept of electrochemical reliability. This is a surprising fact, considering it does not measure electrochemical reliability, it measures a property that is not even directly related to electrochemical reliability, but may have a correlation to it. Between these two factors, a critical evaluation of ROSE testing and its applicability to both its intended use (process control) and its frequent misuse (product acceptance) is needed.
In Part 1 of this research, which was published at SMTAI 2021 we examined the relationship between ionic contamination and ROSE results in the context of method validation. Part 1 helped to establish what the sensitivity of ROSE is, in terms of the minimum amount of contamination required for a statistically valid response, as well as the nature of the response function of ROSE to changes in input (e.g., slope of a linear function).
In this follow-on work, we compare these metrics of the ROSE test method to those of SIR, with the goal of determining the relationship between changes in ROSE data and the corresponding change in electrochemical reliability, as measured by SIR. One illustrative example of the relationship between ROSE and SIR which we wish to explore is how much the ROSE data can vary before a shift in SIR or Electrochemical Migration is observed. This information would be critical to evaluating the use of ROSE testing for process control. Furthermore, combining the data from Part 1 we aim to observe what, if any, danger there is in using ROSE values as a criterion for product acceptance.