Corrosion resistance is becoming one of the most important topics in the electronics industry. Corrosion results in field
failures and huge losses,which annually total several billion U.S. dollars. The actual extent of losses caused by corrosion is
not well documented in the industry. As such,corrosion is currently one of the most challenging topics and is acquiring
more attention as a result of increased product warranties,new materials and process changes caused by recent legislation
impacting the electronics industry.
Another factor is that the industry used in the past the lead containing surface finish “Hot Air Solder Leveling” (HASL) in
very large volumes. This surface finish does have a superior corrosion resistance because of the Copper/Tin IMC and the
corrosion resistance of the tin surface itself. Therefore corrosion resistance was for a long time no topic for the applications
using HASL. But since the RoHS legislation came in effect in July 2006 and the use of lead containing HASL was restricted,
the industry has looked into and qualified new alternative lead-free surface finishes. Furthermore the lead-free version of
HASL shows some major disadvantages like uneven deposition thickness and as a higher working temperature is needed,a
detrimental impact on the base material cannot be avoided. Companies do expect from these new alternative surface finishes
to show the same corrosion resistance like HASL but many missed to investigate these alternatives concerning their
corrosion resistance performance in combination with their applications. It only came to the attention of the electronics
Industry as they were recently confronted with more and more field failures due to corrosion.
Depending on the final application and the environment to which the product is exposed,the requirements for corrosion
resistance can be significantly different. Products used in military,automotive and medical applications typically demand
higher corrosion resistance than products for lower performance or lifetime expectations,such as consumer electronics or
similar products used in non-aggressive environments. As a result,to avoid corrosion on electronic products each industry
sector has essentially adopted its own reliability testing procedures and standards. These facts all lead to the question,
“What is the right corrosion resistance level of the surface finish for a particular product?”
One key function of surface finishes on printed wiring boards (PWB) is the protection of the underlying metal surface from
environmental influences until assembly operations,such as soldering or wire-bonding,are performed. Also,after assembly
there are areas on the PWB that are not covered by solder,including contact pads,test pads,heat seal and heat sink areas
and the inside of through holes and vias. These areas are covered only by the surface finish and must still be resistant
against any corrosive environment in the field. When corrosion occurs on a surface finish the metal decays and undefined
corrosion products are created. The result of this process could be either an “open”,caused by attack of the underlying
copper or a “short”,caused by creep from undefined corrosion products.
This paper investigates the performance of seven primary types of surface finishes using four different corrosion tests. The
compiled data,findings and recommendations are offered as a guide to selecting the most suitable surface finish based on the
end use application and required level of corrosion resistance.
Author(s)
Mustafa Özkök,Joe McGurran,Hugh Roberts,Kenneth Lee,Guenter Heinz