Are Regional Differences in PCB Technology as Great as We Think?
By Denny Fritz, Fritz Consulting
We keep hearing that Asia is all consumer and automotive electronics and North
Key Summary
• IPC’s PCB Technology Trends study shows regional PCB differences are smaller than commonly assumed
• Asia produces most global PCBs but North America and Europe share similar priorities on materials and board construction
• Flex circuits show the largest variation with more low layer consumer flex produced in Asia
• North America and Europe specify more buried vias while Asia leads in HDI volume
• Capital investment priorities are aligned across regions with direct imaging and AOI topping the list
• Reliability and cost remain the top technical challenges everywhere
America and Europe are all high reliability/long life. The findings in IPC’s PCB Technology Trends 2018 study show that these regions are not as different as expected, and the differences we do see are interesting. There are small differences in rigid board layers, line widths and materials. A bigger difference shows up in flexible circuits where there is more low-layer count flex going into consumer electronics. True, North America and Europe have more rigid construction boards going into long-life (11 to 25+ years) products, pushing reliability. HDI construction is larger in Asia, as expected, but certainly not unknown in North America and Europe. North American and European OEMs specified significantly more buried vias than Asia. This could reflect either better acceptance of sub-laminations or more “any layer via” construction(not needing sub-laminations) in Asia. But, as Asia produces eight times as many boards as North America and Europe, Asian fabrication is quite capable of meeting the buried via needs of the other regions. The study also shows that investment in direct imaging and AOI are the top two capital equipment investment priorities of the industry in both regions for the next two years. Likewise, reliability and cost were the top two technical challenges for the industry in both regions. Are these findings consistent with your experiences of making or specifying PCBs in different regions? Do you think the regional differences are getting smaller? We welcome your comments.
The IPC study shows most differences are smaller than expected, with many shared priorities across regions.
Flexible circuits, as Asia produces more low layer count flex for consumer electronics.
They specify more sub lamination or complex constructions, while Asia often relies on any layer via approaches.
Yes. Asia produces roughly eight times more PCBs than North America and Europe combined.
Yes. Direct imaging and AOI are top capital investment areas globally, and reliability plus cost are top technical challenges everywhere.
IPC Day 2019 - Hungary
IPC and its partners Microsolder and ELAS, IPC licensed training centers in Hungary, welcomed more than 60 industry experts and members to IPC Day, Hungary held at the Groupama Arena, the largest football stadium in Budapest.
This one-day workshop provided an opportunity for attendees to network and exchange knowledge and represented an ambitious effort to expand awareness of IPC standards and activities among the dynamic electronics industry community in Hungary.
Peter Regos, Master IPC Trainer (MIT), Managing Director of Microsolder and István Hámornik, Managing Director of ELAS, gave opening remarks ahead of Philippe Léonard, IPC Europe Director, who presented information on electronics industry perspectives. Léonard walked the audience through a detailed overview of upcoming IPC activities in Europe including:
- IPC Transportation Initiative
- IPC now using DRM Protected Documents
- IPC EDGE, IPC’s online learning platform
- ICP Certified Standards Expert (CSE) certification program
- IPC-CFX, the Connected Factory Exchange for Industry 4.0
- Using J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 together
- IPC standards and automotive addendums
- IPC standards and space addendums
- IPC standards available in Hungarian
- Industry skills gap and IPC tackling the industry’s workforce challenges
Later, Microsolder Managing Director, Csaba Császár gave a presentation on how to increase the reliability of PCBs using IPC standards.
Finally, Gábor Hámornik and Gábor Ozsváth from ELAS introduced available liquid dispensing technologies in the electronics industry that comply with IPC standards.
Attendees had the unique opportunity to learn about IPC and how to get further involved at local and European levels, network with like-minded peers and visit Hungary’s most famous football stadium.
IPC’s ambitious plan for 2019 aims to significantly increase local engagement in Europe and develop more events and education opportunities at the local level.
Interested in organising an IPC Day in your company/city? Please, contact Philippe Léonard at philippeleonard@ipc.org
Hosted by:

IPC Welcomes New Senior Director of Sales
United States Increases Tariffs on More Chinese Products
by Chris Mitchell, IPC vice president, global government relations
Key Summary
• The United States increased tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent on $200 billion in Chinese products
• New exclusions were added to earlier tariff lists, including items commonly used in manufacturing
• Negotiations had shown progress, but U.S. officials said China backtracked on key commitments
• Additional tariff increases on all Chinese imports remain possible depending on future talks
• China has pledged retaliatory tariffs, keeping trade tensions high
The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has published the official Federal Register notice increasing tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent on another $200 billion worth of Chinese products, effective at 12:01 a.m. on Friday. Meanwhile, the USTR also has added more products to the list of exclusions from the first round of tariffs. The list includes numerous codes for items used in manufacturing, including spools of aluminum and steel and coils; push-button switches; DC electric motors and AC electric motors. U.S. and Chinese officials have met regularly since January to resolve long-standing trade issues with the goal of de-escalating trade tensions and easing the tit-for-tat tariff increases that took effect last year. Officials from both countries have reported progress in negotiations over the past few months, but the U.S. posture changed abruptly last week. U.S. officials, according to news reports, felt that Chinese officials had “backtracked” on key commitments, including IP and technology transfer reforms. In response, President Trump personally decided to increase tariffs this week. Meetings between senior U.S. and Chinese trade officials are scheduled to resume today. We are unlikely to see an agreement this week, as had been the goal. President Trump has suggested that he may also impose new or increased tariffs on all Chinese products imported into the U.S., but a decision that bold would hinge on the President’s estimation of whether a deal can get done and what pressure is necessary to strike it. The Chinese have promised retaliatory tariffs. As always, please contact me if you have concerns, insights or questions.
U.S. officials said Chinese negotiators pulled back from commitments on issues such as intellectual property and technology transfer. In response, President Trump directed the tariff rate to increase as a pressure tactic in the ongoing trade discussions.
The increase applied to $200 billion in Chinese imports, while some exclusions were added for earlier lists, including items like spools, coils, push-button switches, and electric motors that are widely used in manufacturing operations.
Yes. Meetings between senior trade officials were scheduled to resume, but an agreement was not expected immediately. Negotiations have continued since January, though progress stalled due to disagreements over key reform commitments.
President Trump suggested the possibility of imposing tariffs on all Chinese imports if needed to influence negotiations. Whether this occurs depends on the administration’s assessment of progress and strategic pressure required to secure a deal.
Export Controls in Flux
To help electronics companies comply with these rules and stay abreast of developments, IPC recently held three training workshops in California, Illinois, and Virginia, with the California and Virginia workshops sponsored and hosted by TTM Technologies.
Featured speaker Gary Stanley – president of Global Legal Services, PC, and one of the nation’s top legal experts on export controls – gave an in-depth presentation that covered the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), Export Administration Regulations (EAR), and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) cybersecurity, with a focus on printed circuit boards and electronics.
Among the key points that Gary stressed were the following:
• Correctly determining the commodity jurisdiction (State Dept./ITAR versus Commerce Dept./EAR) and the commodity classification (U.S. Munitions List versus Commerce Control List) is the most critical step in complying with U.S. export controls, because only then will you know what licensing requirements apply.
• Communicate, communicate, communicate! Open lines of communication within your company's functional areas, e.g. legal, sales, procurement, IT, HR, as well as you’re your customers and suppliers, is essential to avoiding export control mistakes.
• Measures relating to Trusted Suppliers, DFARS cybersecurity, and export controls certainly overlap, but each regulatory area has its own special requirements.
• The most effective export control managers typically display intellectual curiosity, attention to detail, extroversion, and political skills. The last trait is important because export control managers must occasionally say “no” to their CEOs and colleagues, while maintaining their cooperation and support.
The workshops also featured remarks by Special Agents from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry & Security, Office of Export Enforcement, who addressed, among other things, “red flags” to be aware of when approached by a potential customer, especially if that potential customer is new, foreign, and/or unknown to your company.
Other speakers at the workshop presented on IPC-1791, Trusted Electronic Designer, Fabricator and Assembler Requirement; supply-chain risk management within the U.S. Department of Defense printed-circuit-board supply chain; and the DoD Executive Agent for Printed Circuit Board and Interconnect Technology.
It is the responsibility of the company to understand all export control rules and regulations and ensure that they are in compliance. That’s why IPC will continue to make educational opportunities available on this topic, and why we encourage you to ensure that your company has solid export-control-compliance measures in place.Engineer Connects Education, Industry and IPC
A chance encounter between Moyer and IPC President and CEO, John W. Mitchell led to a partnership in developing an online, instructor-led Introductory PCB Design course offered through IPC. The first class just ended. The next class starts on May 7 and is open for registration. The six-week online IPC PCB Design Fundamentals course utilizes interactive webinars, on-demand recorded class sessions, job-specific exercises, and team projects to facilitate mastery of the key concepts required by circuit board designers. IPCEF took the opportunity to ask Moyer about his experience teaching his first IPC class.
Moyer responded, “It’s very rewarding to give back to the next generation of board designers by teaching PCB design both at the university level through Sacramento State University as well as through the new IPC EDGE training portal. I have been able to successfully design and build PWBs and CCAs for some of the most extreme environments and a lot of that knowledge flows directly from IPC’s standards and certification activities.”
Moyer is also the faculty advisor of our first IPC Student Chapter at Sacramento State. He partnered with student Scott O’Hair, an IPC Emerging Engineer, to start the chapter with O’Hair as the first IPC student chapter president.
Scott O’Hair added, “My experience as an IPC Emerging Engineer really expanded my knowledge of the electronics industry. I received a lot of insight from my mentors and attending IPC APEX EXPO give you the chance to see some impressive technology in action. The networking events can open up career opportunities as well and I wanted to share those benefits with my fellow students.”
The Sacramento State IPC Student Chapter was the first of six chapters launched during IPC APEX EXPO 2019. Aaron Birney, IPC’s manager of education programs, describes IPC Student Chapters as “a way for students to engage IPC members and learn about real-world manufacturing processes, make connections within the industry, and lay the groundwork for internships.”
The IPC Education Foundation, a 501©(3) organization, focuses on strengthening and shaping the emerging workforce by providing educational opportunities, connecting the emerging workforce with industry opportunities, improving the perception of the industry, and offering scholarships to deserving students.
For more information on the IPC Education Foundation, contact Birney at AaronBirney@ipc.org or visit www.ipcef.org.IPC’s PCB Technology Trends Study Details How PCB Manufacturers Meet Current and Future Technology Demands
Every Day is a Good Day to Focus on Worker Health and Safety
North American PCB Sales Growth Stays Strong, Order Growth Slows
IPC’s monthly PCB industry statistics are based on data provided by a representative sample of both rigid PCB and flexible circuit manufacturers selling in the USA and Canada. IPC publishes the PCB book-to-bill ratio at the end of each month. Statistics for the current month are normally available in the last week of the following month.