Stencil printing is a critical first step in surface mount assembly. It is often cited that the solder paste printing operation causes about 50%-80% of the defects found in the assembly of PCBs. Printing is widely recognized as a complex process whose optimal performance depends on the adjustment of a substantial number of parameters. It is not uncommon to hear that stencil printing is more of an art than science. In fact,the process is so complex that sub-optimal print parameters usually end up being used. In addition,stencil printing produces relatively noisy data,which makes the print process extremely difficult to control. Minimizing the variance of the deposited location and volumes will improve the quality of the process and produce more reliable solder joints.
In an effort to improve the performance of stencil printers,continuous process monitoring and statistical process control
techniques have traditionally been used. However,these techniques require constant process tweaking and highly depend on process expertise. Presently,manufacturing engineers tune control parameters to a recommended nominal value suggested by
the equipment and/or solder paste manufacturers. In general,line engineers optimize control parameters by printing a few initial boards and hope that the process stays in control. However,when a process disturbance or drift occurs,the yield of the process typically degrades rapidly to the point of becoming unacceptable.
In general,there are two critical aspects to a printing process. You want to put down the right volume of paste on the right spot. In another word,we not only have to monitor the amount of paste volume we also need to monitor X,Y and ? registration of the board. This issue is compounded when dealing with miniature components such as 0201,01005,0.4 mm and 0.3 mm CSP’s and lead free paste. Lead-free paste is known to have less spread,or wet-ability,and adds to the challenge.
To improve the performance of the solder paste printing process we have identified several control schemes that can be developed into commercial products with no technical risks. These are automated print registration correction,automated stencil inspection coupled with stencil wiping and finally,advanced closed loop control consisting of print parameters adjustment (such as,squeegee speed) based on the 3D SPI volume,area and/or height measurements.
In this paper we present selected results from the first phase of this work focusing on print registration control,using a closed loop control scheme.