A Comparison of PCB Adhesion Test Methods and Adhesion Promoters
Interest in the adhesive strength of PCBs has recently come to the forefront of the industry. This has been driven by the
advent of lead free soldering processes that severely stress the mechanical properties of the board. For sometime,the
accepted test method for measuring adhesion in the PCB industry has been the widely used peel strength test. At the same
time,it has been common knowledge within the industry that this technique has been less than adequate in guarding against
delamination failures during reflow and wave soldering. In recognition of this deficiency,a new test was recently introduced
and the test method is now a part of IPC 650; the so called “T260 Method” in which a thermal event is imposed that causes a
delamination of the test specimen.
This paper presents a statistical comparison of the two test methods. The correlation is found to be very poor indicating the
failure mechanisms measured by the two tests are structurally dissimilar. An analysis is then carried out to mathematically
define the stress fields created by the two tests. As suspected,the stress fields are significantly different. Finally,these two
tests are used to compare the strength of two different copper adhesion promotion chemistries,the Black Oxide coating and
an Alternative coating. Most empirical observations have found that the performance of the coatings is equivalent; however,
only the T260 test agrees with this observation.