SIR Test Vehicles - Comparison from a Cleaning Perspective
PCB design has evolved greatly in recent years becoming ever more complex. Board density is increasing,component standoff heights are decreasing and long term reliability requirements are greater than ever,particularly for Class III products. Given the quality and reliability demands for complex PCBs,manufacturing processes are qualified; that is,the PCB design,including component and solder paste/flux selection,material compatibility and process steps,must meet the long term reliability requirements demanded and quality standards desired. As a result,cleaning is becoming a mandatory step within the manufacturing process. Analytical tests are key elements to any qualification process. Through the IPC,numerous tests have been developed and have been added to industry standards. In particular,IPC-TM-650,method 2.6.3.7 or SIR (Surface Insulation Resistance) is frequently used regardless of the solder paste/flux type. Per the specification,this test can quantify the deleterious effects of fabrication,process or handling residues on SIR in the presence of moisture. Measuring changes in surface resistance is a standard way of testing cleanliness and long-term reliability of a test board or complete process assembly based on industry standards. There are numerous test vehicle options available to the industry for conducting SIR analysis. This study was designed to compare different SIR test vehicles,from a cleaning perspective,in order to determine which,test vehicle is tougher to clean and therefore challenge the cleaning process. The three (3) test vehicles selected were the IPC-B-52,IPC-B-36 and the SMTA Saber. Each test vehicle was populated with specific components. The authors chose to reflow the test vehicles with water soluble solder paste only,since the high activity flux in the water soluble paste would increase the chance of SIR failure if left partially cleaned. Multiple test vehicles were prepared. Cleanliness verification and validation was completed by visual inspection underneath all components as well as by performing SIR tests. All test vehicles were cleaned prior to reflow and ion chromatography was conducted on selected test vehicles initially to ensure they were free of any ionics. An inline cleaning process was used for all cleaning trials.